Southern Shores of Singapore
about our shores: galleries | stories & visitor info | media articles
 
The Straits Times, 30 Dec 04

Suggested 15% gaming tax is 'fair rate'

A PROPOSED 15 per cent gaming tax has turned out to be the most attractive recommendation among the guidelines the Government has drawn up for a potential integrated resort here. While not cast in stone and meant as a working assumption for investors to do their sums, casino operators and gaming experts contacted yesterday said that such a quantum of tax on gross gaming revenue fell into the lower ranges of what other countries levied.

'It is a very fair rate,' said Las-Vegas based gaming analyst Jonathan Galaviz. Harrah's Entertainment senior vice-president (business development) Richard Mirman agreed that it was 'reasonable', pointing to tax rates in the United States, which range from about 7 per cent in Nevada to as high as 50 per cent in Illinois. The gaming giant owns 28 casinos across the US and is in the process of acquiring the well-known Caesars brand. In the region, Macau has a gaming tax of close to 40 per cent, Australia's ranges from 6 per cent to over 30 per cent depending on the state, and South Korea's stands at about 30 per cent, experts said.

Casino operators and analysts said a 15 per cent tax rate would help make up for the expected fall in revenue that would arise from the entry restrictions imposed by the Government.

Among other requirements, Singaporeans and permanent residents have to be at least 21 years old and would have to pay a $100 membership fee per day, or $2,000 annually. Mr Ronald Tan, a consultant specialising in the hospitality industry and who has worked as an adviser to casino gaming companies, said: 'The curbs can be quite serious dampeners.'

Mr Galaviz added that having a local market was 'symbiotic' with a tourist one, as both allow for the 'feasibility of building a large-scale resort'. The view was echoed by Mr Mirman: 'Restrictions reduce overall demand by taking out a certain segment of the market. It is going to be a challenge to build something of the same size and scale.' But Harrah's, which previously indicated that it was prepared to pump in at least US$1 billion (S$1.64 billion) here, still 'believes this is a very viable business'. US gaming giants like MGM-Mirage, Harrah's Entertainment and Las Vegas Sands, as well as Bahamas' Kerzner International have all indicated keen interest in a Singapore integrated resort project, even giving investment estimates of between US$1 billion and US$2 billion.

Sources say the operators have teamed up with local developers to submit proposals but none of the parties involved would confirm this. It is said that MGM-Mirage and Kerzner International have teamed up with CapitaLand, Harrah's Entertainment has partnered Keppel Land, while Las Vegas Sands is said to be working with Hotel Properties.

Yesterday, Senior Minister of State for Trade and Industry Vivian Balakrishnan said the Government will not subsidise the project, nor will it take a stake in it. But he added that he doesn't speak for government-linked companies, which are not part of the Government.

Although Dr Balakrishnan said he is ready to consider a resort without a casino component, overseas experiences have shown that similar entertainment hubs may not be economically viable if the casino component is removed. 'Revenue generated from the casino is used to cross-subsidise the other non-gaming attractions, which in turn attract the large number of visitors. These facilities leverage off each other and become viable because of the high volume of traffic drawn to the wide range of entertainment options available,' he said, pointing to the Atlantis model in the Bahamas. Some 75 per cent of Atlantis' total revenues come from non-gaming components like retail and dining.

But the gaming taxes, estimated to be 10 per cent of gaming revenues collected by the Bahamas government last year, was US$23 million. Aside from the competitive tax rate, another attraction is the exclusivity period for licences awarded - preliminarily put at 10 years - which would go some way towards restricting supply, said Mr Mirman.

  website©ria tan 2003 www.wildsingapore.com