| |
The
Straits Times, 3 Jan 05
Dissimilar
sites, so different design requirements
DEPENDING on where the integrated resort is located, it could end
up looking very different. Of the companies which have indicated interest
in the project, those whose core business is running casinos have
said they preferred the Marina Bay site because of its convenient
location. But those who run mega-resorts where the casino is just
one part of the operations wanted Sentosa for its proxi- mity to the
sea and close-to-nature setting.
The two dissimilar sites have led to the Government calling for different
design requirements in its Request for Concepts document to investors.
Marina Bay has more guidelines governing it because of its accessibility.
At the 13.5ha site, the Government is looking for architecture that
is 'potentially award-winning'.
The document also adds: 'In general, themed architectural styles,
replicating overseas cities or historical and mythical locations are
not considered appropriate.' The designer needs to keep Singapore's
hot and humid weather in mind, so there should be landscaped terraces
and roof gardens. This development should also include an 'iconic'
attraction on the Bayfront, such as a museum, aquarium or art gallery,
which should generate high visitor traffic.
With the 35.6ha site on Sentosa, the Government is looking for a 'world-class
resort' that will make the island a 'must visit' destination for tourists
to the region. 'The overall architectural style should be complementary
to the tropical island features of the site. This includes respecting
and taking full advantage of the existing flora, natural terrain and
coastal features,' the document says.
On both sites, the casino must not be visible from the outside of
the resort. Visitors should not have to go through the casino to access
other facilities and public areas. The resort must also have a range
of other activities and amenities, from shopping and dining to hotels
and convention facilities.
|
|
